Shalatu wa Alhamdulillah wa salamu 'ala amma rasulillah .......... ba'du. A few days before Prof. KH. Ibrahim Hosen, sick and ultimately to God Almighty, I am a car with him. At that time he gave something, which is as if the essence of what I've been taught.
In the QS. Ali Imran, verse 7 God Almighty says: "huwa al-ladzî anzala 'al-alaîka paragraph kitâba minhu muhkamât hunna umm kitâbi wa al-ukharu mtasyâbihât, amma fa fi al-ladzîna ma qulûbuhum zaîgun fayattib'ûn minhu tasyâbaha wa al-fitna abtigâ 'a ta'wîlih, wa ma ta'wilahû illa Allahu wa al-rasikhûna fi al-'ilmi yaqûlûna amannâ al-dad .... ....
Above verse states that in the Qur'an there are two kinds of verse, there are verses and there are also muhkamât verses Book;. Muhkamât verses do not need interpretation, while the verses of Book; still needs interpretation to memhaminya.
In interpreting the verses that are necessary interpreted (verse Book;), the scholars are divided into two major groups. First, a group that interprets the verses Ahkam (verses related laws), the expert group of scholars of fiqh. And second, scholars who interpret the verses related to 'aqidah. This is done by the scholars of the science of kalam and Muslim philosophers.
What is produced by the scholars of fiqh (Islamic jurists) is something that finished among the jurists. What dianafihasilkan from an expert's view of fiqh, and is different from the view of scholars in other fiqh, it is a common thing. That's why different traditions view (deviation) between the scholars of fiqh is a common trdasi. This is something that is clear, obvious.
In the meantime, what is produced by the philosophers, the scholars kalam, is something that nature is always a process.
The scholars of fiqh scholars, many of them, but which is considered the most productive is only 4, Imam Maliki, Imam Hambali, Imam Shafi'i and Imam Hanafi. They are trying to interpret the Qur'an, and from the interpretation that they produce Islamic laws. They are scholars, thinkers and producers of Islamic laws.
Who are its customers? Certainly Muslims in general, or commonly referred to as the 'Awwam, as we are-we are all. So we as Muslims, it is to consume and poisisnya practice fiqh opinions produced by the experts, the scholars of fiqh experts.
In addition to the 'Awwam, consumer products are also thinking of the jurists are also community groups tashawuf (shufi).
Facing the Persaoalan 'mengkosumsi Awwam in fiqh expert's view is that when a lot of difference (khilafiyah) in determining the law of one case. So should the 'Awwam holding on the proposition, "he yasirrû wa tu'assirû". Adhered to the principle of the difficult easier.
In contrast to the 'Awwam, shufi the problem knows no deviation. For the Sufis, if there are two groups of scholars, have different views between the one and the other, the Sufis would choose the most damning view. If there are two groups of scholars, the group declared that it is haraam to eat squid and group B declared kosher, then people will choose shufi A. This is different from the 'Awwam, if there are two different views as above, then the' Awwam choose an easier opinion, because there is an underlying proposition, yassirû wa la tu'assirû earlier. And Allaah knows best bi al-shawab (AM)
In the QS. Ali Imran, verse 7 God Almighty says: "huwa al-ladzî anzala 'al-alaîka paragraph kitâba minhu muhkamât hunna umm kitâbi wa al-ukharu mtasyâbihât, amma fa fi al-ladzîna ma qulûbuhum zaîgun fayattib'ûn minhu tasyâbaha wa al-fitna abtigâ 'a ta'wîlih, wa ma ta'wilahû illa Allahu wa al-rasikhûna fi al-'ilmi yaqûlûna amannâ al-dad .... ....
Above verse states that in the Qur'an there are two kinds of verse, there are verses and there are also muhkamât verses Book;. Muhkamât verses do not need interpretation, while the verses of Book; still needs interpretation to memhaminya.
In interpreting the verses that are necessary interpreted (verse Book;), the scholars are divided into two major groups. First, a group that interprets the verses Ahkam (verses related laws), the expert group of scholars of fiqh. And second, scholars who interpret the verses related to 'aqidah. This is done by the scholars of the science of kalam and Muslim philosophers.
What is produced by the scholars of fiqh (Islamic jurists) is something that finished among the jurists. What dianafihasilkan from an expert's view of fiqh, and is different from the view of scholars in other fiqh, it is a common thing. That's why different traditions view (deviation) between the scholars of fiqh is a common trdasi. This is something that is clear, obvious.
In the meantime, what is produced by the philosophers, the scholars kalam, is something that nature is always a process.
The scholars of fiqh scholars, many of them, but which is considered the most productive is only 4, Imam Maliki, Imam Hambali, Imam Shafi'i and Imam Hanafi. They are trying to interpret the Qur'an, and from the interpretation that they produce Islamic laws. They are scholars, thinkers and producers of Islamic laws.
Who are its customers? Certainly Muslims in general, or commonly referred to as the 'Awwam, as we are-we are all. So we as Muslims, it is to consume and poisisnya practice fiqh opinions produced by the experts, the scholars of fiqh experts.
In addition to the 'Awwam, consumer products are also thinking of the jurists are also community groups tashawuf (shufi).
Facing the Persaoalan 'mengkosumsi Awwam in fiqh expert's view is that when a lot of difference (khilafiyah) in determining the law of one case. So should the 'Awwam holding on the proposition, "he yasirrû wa tu'assirû". Adhered to the principle of the difficult easier.
In contrast to the 'Awwam, shufi the problem knows no deviation. For the Sufis, if there are two groups of scholars, have different views between the one and the other, the Sufis would choose the most damning view. If there are two groups of scholars, the group declared that it is haraam to eat squid and group B declared kosher, then people will choose shufi A. This is different from the 'Awwam, if there are two different views as above, then the' Awwam choose an easier opinion, because there is an underlying proposition, yassirû wa la tu'assirû earlier. And Allaah knows best bi al-shawab (AM)